Response to Secukinumab Treatment in Active Psoriatic Arthritis Patients- Single Center Experience
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Research Article
P: 161-165
August 2021

Response to Secukinumab Treatment in Active Psoriatic Arthritis Patients- Single Center Experience

J Ankara Univ Fac Med 2021;74(2):161-165
1. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Romatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 18.11.2020
Accepted Date: 15.03.2021
Publish Date: 25.05.2021
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects peripheral joints, axial skeleton and enthesis, nail and skin. T helper-17 cells and Interleukin-17 (IL-17) play a major role in PsA pathogenesis. Secukinumab is a fully human monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 antibody that neutralizes IL-17A which is used for the treatment of moderate/severe psoriasis and PsA. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the response rates of PsA patients, who were followed up at Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Rheumatology, Policlinic of Biological Drug at the 16th week of secukinumab treatment.

Materials and Methods:

In this retrospective study, 18-year-old and older PsA patients, who were diagnosed according to the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis and who were started to secukinumab treatment from May 2018 to December 2019, were enrolled. The disease activity indices at the beginning and at the 16th week of the secukinumab treatment were analyzed. A p-value of <0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Results:

A total of 16 PsA patients were included in the study. There was a statistically significant decrease in tender and swollen joint counts at the beginning of the treatment and 16th week of the treatment. There was also a significant difference in 28 joint disease activity scores with erythrocyte sedimentation rate and 28 joint disease activity scores with C-reactive protein and Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index between two groups (p=0.008, p=0.003, p=0.021, respectively).

Conclusion:

In this study, a decrease in disease activity markers was detected in PsA patients in whom secukinumab was initiated in our clinic compared to the initiation of treatment at the 16th week of treatment. Considering PsA a severe form of arthritis causing joint damage and functional disability, secukinumab promises favorable outcome for the treatment of PsA.

Keywords: Inflammation, Psoriatic Arthritis, Secukinumab

References

1
Mease PJ, McInnes IB, Kirkham B, et al. Secukinumab Inhibition of Interleukin-17A in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1329-1339.
2
Ritchlin CT, Colbert RA, Gladman DD. Psoriatic Arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:957-970.
3
McHugh NJ, Balachrishnan C, Jones SM. Progression of peripheral joint disease in psoriatic arthritis: a 5-yr prospective study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003;42:778-783.
4
Van den Bosch F, Coates L. Clinical management of psoriatic arthritis. Lancet. 2018;391:2285-2294.
5
Marinoni B, Ceribelli A, Massarotti MS, et al. The Th17 axis in psoriatic disease: pathogenetic and therapeutic implications. Auto Immun Highlights. 2014;5:9-19.
6
McInnes IB, Mease PJ, Kirkham B, et al. Secukinumab, a human anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (FUTURE 2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2015;386:1137-1146.
7
Lubrano E, Perrotta FM. Beyond TNF Inhibitors: New Pathways and Emerging Treatments for Psoriatic Arthritis. Drugs. 2016;76:663-673.
8
Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P, et al. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:2665-2673.
9
van Gestel AM, Prevoo ML, van ‘t Hof MA, et al. Development and validation of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Comparison with the preliminary American College of Rheumatology and the World Health Organization/International League Against Rheumatism Criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:34-40.
10
Aletaha D, Nell VP, Stamm T, et al. Acute phase reactants add little to composite disease activity indices for rheumatoid arthritis: validation of a clinical activity score. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7:796-806.
11
Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, et al. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol. 1994;21:2286-2291.
12
Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, et al. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1980;23:137-145.
13
McInnes IB, Sieper J, Braun J, et al. Efficacy and safety of secukinumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriatic arthritis: a 24-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II proof-of-concept trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:349-356.
14
Kanelleas A, Liapi C, Katoulis A, et al. The role of inflammatory markers in assessing disease severity and response to treatment in patients with psoriasis treated with etanercept. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2011;36:845-850.
15
Beygi S, Lajevardi V, Abedini R. C-reactive protein in psoriasis: a review of the literature. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28:700-711.
16
Asahina A, Umezawa Y, Yanaba K, et al. Serum C-reactive protein levels in Japanese patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Long-term differential effects of biologics. J Dermatol. 2016;43:779-784.
17
McInnes IB, Mease PJ, Ritchlin CT, et al. Secukinumab sustains improvement in signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis: 2 year results from the phase 3 FUTURE 2 study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56:1993-2003.
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House