The Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Features of Nipple Adenoma
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Research Article
P: 259-263
August 2021

The Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Features of Nipple Adenoma

J Ankara Univ Fac Med 2021;74(2):259-263
1. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Patoloji Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 21.03.2021
Accepted Date: 23.03.2021
Publish Date: 25.05.2021
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Nipple adenoma is a benign breast tumor presenting with nipple erosion and bloody nipple discharge, causing the clinical suspicion of Paget’s disease, and creating difficulty in diagnosis due to the histopathologically complex morphological pattern. In our study, we aimed to examine the histopathological and immunohistochemical features of this rare tumor.

Materials and Methods:

For this purpose, 11 nipple adenomas diagnosed in Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology between 2005 and 2020 were included in the study. Clinical information was obtained from patient files. Histomorphological and immunohistochemically p63, SMA, kaldesmon, ER and CK5/6 staining properties of the tumors were evaluated. Accompanying ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma rates were recorded.

Results:

The mean age of the patients was determined to be 44.1 years (minimum: 25, maximum: 59) and it was observed that all of the patients were female. Clinical presentation was with bloody or serous nipple discharge, subareolar nodule or a palpable mass.

The average tumor diameter was measured as 0.9 cm (minimum: 0.4 cm, maximum: 1.2 cm). Sclerosing papillomatosis (36.4%), mixed (36.4%) and papillomatosis (27.2%) growth patterns were observed. Erosion was detected in the epidermis at a rate of 36.4%. Necrosis and cytological atypia were observed in areas of florid hyperplasia with a rate of 18.2%. Concomitant invasive ductal carcinoma (18.2%), low nuclear grade ductal carcinoma in situ (9.1%) and invasive lobular carcinoma (9.1%) were seen. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed the presence of p63, SMA, caldesmon positive myoepithelial cells in adenoma areas, heterogeneous positivity with ER and expression loss was not observed with CK5/6.

Conclusion:

Nipple adenomas are rare tumors that clinically and pathologically require the differential diagnosis of malignancy. In addition, close clinical follow-up of the patients should be performed, since breast carcinoma can be observed in the adenoma or in another location in the breast simultaneously or afterwards.

Keywords: Nipple Adenoma, Breast Cancer, Paget’s Disease, Nipple Discharge, Nipple Erosion

References

1
Dabbs D. Breast Pathology.  2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier.; 2017.s. 330-339.
2
Ying S, Fang H, Qiao J. Erosive Adenomatosis of the Nipple: A Clinical Diagnostic Challenge. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2020;13:587-590.
3
Rosen PP, Caicco JA. Florid papillomatosis of the nipple. A study of 51 patients, including nine with mammary carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1986;10:87-101.
4
Breast Tumours. Who Classification of Tumours Editorial Board..5th ed. Volume 2.  Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.; 2019. s.  182-183.
5
Diaz NM, Palmer JO, Wick MR. Erosive adenomatosis of the nipple: histology, immunohistology, and differential diagnosis. Mod Pathol 1992;5:179-184.
6
Bhagavan BS, Patchefsky A, Koss LG. Florid subareolar duct papillomatosis (nipple adenoma) and mammary carcinoma: report of three cases. Hum Pathol. 1973;4:289-295.
7
Brownstein MH, Phelps RG, Magnin PH. Papillary adenoma of the nipple: analysis of fifteen new cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;12:707-715.
8
Moulin G, Darbon P, Balme B, et al. Adénomatose érosive du mamelon. A propos de 10 cas avec étude immunohistochimique [Erosive adenomatosis of the nipple. Report of 10 cases with immunohistochemistry]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1990;117:537-545.
9
Jones MW, Tavassoli FA. Coexistence of nipple duct adenoma and breast carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of five cases and review of the literature. Mod Pathol. 1995;8:633-636.
10
Yang GZ, Li J, Ding HY. [Nipple adenoma: report of 18 cases with review of literatures]. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2009;38:614-616.
11
DI Bonito M, Cantile M, Collina F, et al. Adenoma of the nipple: A clinicopathological report of 13 cases. Oncol Lett. 2014;7:1839-1842.
12
Fornage BD, Faroux MJ, Pluot M, et al. Nipple adenoma simulating carcinoma. Misleading clinical, mammographic, sonographic, and cytologic findings. J Ultrasound Med. 1991;10:55-57. 
13
Abdulwaasey M, Tariq MU, Minhas K, et al. Invasive Breast Carcinoma Arising in a Nipple Adenoma After 15 Years: Report of a Rare Case and Literature Review. Cureus. 2020;12:e8586. 
14
Wilsher MJ, Desai AJ, Pinder SE. Low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma arising in association with a nipple adenoma. Histopathology. 2020;76:784-787.
15
Sasi W, Banerjee D, Mokbel K, et al. Bilateral florid papillomatosis of the nipple: an unusual indicator for metachronous breast cancer development-a case report. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2014;2014:432609.
16
Liau JY, Lee YH, Tsai JH, et al. Frequent PIK3CA activating mutations in nipple adenomas. Histopathology. 2017;70:195-202.
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House