Retrospective Evaluation of Surgically Treated Patients with Myelomeningocele
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Research Article
P: 73-77
April 2020

Retrospective Evaluation of Surgically Treated Patients with Myelomeningocele

J Ankara Univ Fac Med 2020;73(1):73-77
1. Keçiören Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Nöroşirürji Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye
2. Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Nöroşirürji Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 13.10.2019
Accepted Date: 16.10.2019
Publish Date: 13.05.2020
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Neural tube defects are the most common congenital malformation of the central nervous system. Identification, classification and treatment of spinal malformations are important in terms of prognosis of the neural functions. In this study, the data of 54 patients who underwent surgical treatment for myelomeningocele in our clinic were evaluated retrospectively.

Materials and Methods:

Demographic data, clinical characteristics, accompanying anomalies, timing of surgery, rates of complications, and length of hospital stay were recorded.

Results:

Of the 54 patients included in our study, 27 (50%) were female and 27 (50%) were male. The mean age of the patients was 3.5 (1-22) days. There were consanguinity between 21 (38.9%) parents. The patients had myelomeningocele sac in the lumbosacral region (50%) at most. Since 15 (27.7%) out of the 54 patients that accepted to the clinic, were brought to the hospital 72 hours after birth, the late surgery was applied. Newborns who underwent surgical repair after the first 48 hours had longer length of hospital stay and higher complication rates. Ten (18.5%) patients had rupture of myelomeningocele sac on admission to hospital. Forty-one (%76) patients had hydrocephalus.

Conclusion:

It is very important to refer patients with myelomeningocele to an appropriate medical center, where they will be treated in the early period, considering the effects of early surgical treatment on survival and quality of life.

Keywords: Myelomeningocele, Surgical Time, Prognosis, Complications

References

1
Baker S. Neural tube defects. İn: Greenberg MS. Handbook of Neurosurgery, 3rd ed. Florida: Greenberg Graphics Inc. 1994;157-168.
2
Shaer CM, Chescheir N, Schulkin J. Myelomeningocele: a review of the epidemiology, genetics, risk factors for conception, prenatal diagnosis, and prognosis for affected individuals. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007;62:471-479.
3
Blencowe H, Kancherla V, Moorthie S, et al. Estimates of global and regional prevalence of neural tube defects for 2015: a systematic analysis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1414:31-46.
4
Tomatir AG, Kiray Vural B, Acikbas I, et al. Registries of cases with neural tube defects in Denizli, Turkey, 2004-2010. Genet Mol Res. 2014;20:13:8537-8543.
5
Tunçbilek E. Türkiye’deki yüksek nöral tüp defekti sıklığı ve önlemek için yapılabilecekler. Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi. 2004;47:79-84
6
Copp AJ, Adzick NS, Chitty LS, et al. Spina bifida. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;30:1:15007.
7
Park T. Myelomeningocele. In: Albright L, Pollack I, Adelson D (eds) Principles and practice of pediatric neurosurgery. Thieme: New York.;1999. pp 291-232.
8
Cohen AR, Robinson S. Early management of myelomeningocele. In: McLone DG (ed) Pediatric neurosurgery. Saunders: Philadelphia.;2001. pp 241-258.
9
Charney EB, Weller SC, Sutton LN, et al. Management of the newborn with myelomeningocele: time for a decision-making process. Pediatrics.1985;75:58-64.
10
Talamonti G, D’Aliberti G, Colice M. Myelomeningocele: longterm neurosurgical treatment and follow-up in 202 patients. J Neurosurg. 2007;107(5 Suppl):368-386.
11
Mirzai H, Ersahin Y, Mutluer S, et al. Outcome of patients with myelomeningocele: the Ege University experience. Childs Nerv Syst. 1998;14:120-123.
12
Bowman RM, Mclone DG. Neurosurgical management of spina bifida: research issues. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2010;16:82-87.
13
Tarcan T, Onol FF, Ilker Y. The timing of primary neurosurgical repair significantly affects neurogenic bladder prognosis in children with myelomeningocele. J Urol. 2006;176:1161-1165.
14
Oncel MY, Ozdemir R, Kahilogulları G, et al. The Effect of Surgery Time on Prognosis in Newborns with Meningomyelocele. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012;51:359-362.
15
Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:993-1004.
16
Marreiros H, Loff C, Calado E. Who needs surgery for pediatric myelomeningocele? A retrospective study and literature review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38:626-640.
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House