ABSTRACT
Artificial intelligence is a field of computer science where deep learning is used with all the details in the light of available data by imitating human intelligence and provides convenience in the relevant decision or application area. Its use is increasing with technological developments in many fields and finds a place in many parts of radiation oncology specialty. Beginning from the treatment decision stage, nearly in every step of treatment planning and implementation, and then in almost all of the response evaluation and follow-up processes, its development and use continues by accelerating.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Radiation Oncology
References
1
Feng M, Valdes G, Dixit N, et al. Machine Learning in Radiation Oncology: Opportunities, Requirements, and Needs. Front Oncol. 2018;8:110.
2
Miller AA. Developing an ontology for radiation oncology, master of information and communication technology. Research thesis, School of Information Systems and Technology, University of Wollongong; 2012.
3
Rao JK, Anderson LA, Inui TS, et al. Communication interventions make a difference in conversations between physicians and patients: a systematic review of the evidence. Med Care. 2007;45:340-349.
4
Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, et al. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284(19):2476-2482.
5
Austin CA, Mohottige D, Sudore RL, et al. Tools to Promote Shared Decision Making in Serious Illness: A Systematic Review. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:1213-1221.
6
Roques TW. Patient selection and radiotherapy volume definition - can we improve the weakest links in the treatment chain? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2014;26:353-355.
7
Sharp G, Fritscher KD, Pekar V, et al. Vision 20/20: perspectives on automated image segmentation for radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2014;41:050902.
8
Peressutti D, Schipaanboord B, van Soest J, et al. TU-AB-202-10: how effective are current atlas selection methods for atlas-based Auto-Contouring in radiotherapy planning? Med Phys. 2016;43:3738-3739.
9
Lustberg T, van Soest J, Gooding M, et al. Clinical evaluation of atlas and deep learning based automatic contouring for lung cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2018;126:312-317.
10
Ibragimov B, Xing L. Segmentation of organs-at-risks in head and neck CT images using convolutional neural networks. Med Phys. 2017;44:547-557.
11
Guo Y, Gao Y, Shen D. Deformable MR Prostate Segmentation via Deep Feature Learning and Sparse Patch Matching. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016;35:1077-1089.
12
Kamnitsas K, Ledig C, Newcombe VFJ, et al. Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation. Med Image Anal. 2017;36:61-78.
13
Men K, Zhang T, Chen X, et al. Fully automatic and robust segmentation of the clinical target volume for radiotherapy of breast cancer using big data and deep learning. Phys Med. 2018;50:13-19.
14
Cardenas CE, McCarroll RE, Court LE, et al. Deep Learning Algorithm for Auto-Delineation of High-Risk Oropharyngeal Clinical Target Volumes With Built-In Dice Similarity Coefficient Parameter Optimization Function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;101:468-478.
15
Men K, Dai J, Li Y. Automatic segmentation of the clinical target volume and organs at risk in the planning CT for rectal cancer using deep dilated convolutional neural networks. Med Phys. 2017;44:6377-6389.
16
Jarrett D, Stride E, Vallis K, et al. Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology. Br J Radiol. 2019;92:20190001.
17
Boutilier JJ, Craig T, Sharpe MB, et al. Sample size requirements for knowledge-based treatment planning. Med Phys. 2016;43:1212-1221.
18
Schreibmann E, Fox T. Prior-knowledge treatment planning for volumetric arc therapy using feature-based database mining. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15:4596.
19
Tol JP, Delaney AR, Dahele M, et al. Evaluation of a knowledge-based planning solution for head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91:612-620.
20
Shiraishi S, Tan J, Olsen LA, et al. Knowledge-based prediction of plan quality metrics in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery. Med Phys. 2015;42:908.
21
Moore KL, Brame RS, Low DA, et al. Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:545-551.
22
Ahmed S, Nelms B, Gintz D, et al. A method for a priori estimation of best feasible DVH for organs-at-risk: Validation for head and neck VMAT planning. Med Phys. 2017;44:5486-5497.
23
Fried DV, Chera BS, Das SK. Assessment of PlanIQ Feasibility DVH for head and neck treatment planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18:245-250.
24
McIntosh C, Welch M, McNiven A, et al. Fully automated treatment planning for head and neck radiotherapy using a voxel-based dose prediction and dose mimicking method. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:5926-5944.
25
Valdes G, Simone CB 2nd, Chen J, et al. Clinical decision support of radiotherapy treatment planning: A data-driven machine learning strategy for patient-specific dosimetric decision making. Radiother Oncol. 2017;125:392-397.
26
Chanyavanich V, Das SK, Lee WR, et al. Knowledge-based IMRT treatment planning for prostate cancer. Med Phys. 2011;38:2515-2522.
27
Kusters JMAM, Bzdusek K, Kumar P, et al. Automated IMRT planning in Pinnacle : A study in head-and-neck cancer. Strahlenther Onkol. 2017;193:1031-1038.
28
Rowbottom CG, Webb S, Oldham M. Beam-orientation customization using an artificial neural network. Phys Med Biol. 1999;44:2251-62.
29
Llacer J, Li S, Agazaryan N, et al. Non-coplanar automatic beam orientation selection in cranial IMRT: a practical methodology. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:1337-1368.
30
Naqa EI, Ruijang L, Murphy MJ, editors. Machine learning in radiation oncology: theory and applications. Springer International Publishing; 2015.
31
Valdes G, Chan MF, Lim SB, et al. IMRT QA using machine learning: A multi-institutional validation. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18:279-284.
32
Guidi G, Maffei N, Meduri B, et al. A machine learning tool for re-planning and adaptive RT: A multicenter cohort investigation. Phys Med. 2016;32:1659-1666.
33
Valdes G, Morin O, Valenciaga Y, et al. Use of TrueBeam developer mode for imaging QA. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015;16:322–333.
34
Li Q, Chan MF. Predictive time-series modeling using artificial neural networks for Linac beam symmetry: an empirical study. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017;1387:84-94.
35
Valdes G, Scheuermann R, Hung CY, et al. A mathematical framework for virtual IMRT QA using machine learning. Med Phys. 2016;43:4323.
36
Carlson JN, Park JM, Park SY, et al. A machine learning approach to the accurate prediction of multi-leaf collimator positional errors. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:2514-2531.
37
Guidi G, Maffei N, Vecchi C, et al. Expert system classifier for adaptive radiation therapy in prostate cancer. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2017;40:337-348.
38
Tseng HH, Luo Y, Cui S, et al. Deep reinforcement learning for automated radiation adaptation in lung cancer. Med Phys. 2017;44:6690-6705.
39
Varfalvy N, Piron O, Cyr MF, et al. Classification of changes occurring in lung patient during radiotherapy using relative analysis and hidden Markov models. Med Phys. 2017;44:5043-5050.
40
Oakden-Rayner L, Carneiro G, Bessen T, et al. Precision Radiology: Predicting longevity using feature engineering and deep learning methods in a radiomics framework. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1648.
41
Lao J, Chen Y, Li ZC, et al. A Deep Learning-Based Radiomics Model for Prediction of Survival in Glioblastoma Multiforme. Sci Rep. 2017;7:10353.
42
Li Z, Wang Y, Yu J, et al. Deep Learning based Radiomics (DLR) and its usage in noninvasive IDH1 prediction for low grade glioma. Sci Rep. 2017;7:5467.
43
Cha KH, Hadjiiski L, Chan HP, et al. Bladder Cancer Treatment Response Assessment in CT using Radiomics with Deep-Learning. Sci Rep. 2017;7:8738.
44
Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT, et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4006.
45
Dou TH, Coroller TP, van Griethuysen JJM, et al. Peritumoral radiomics features predict distant metastasis in locally advanced NSCLC. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0206108.
46
Kang J, Schwartz R, Flickinger J, et al. Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Radiation Therapy Outcomes: A Clinician’s Perspective. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;93:1127-1135.
47
Zhang HH, D’Souza WD, Shi L, et al. Modeling plan-related clinical complications using machine learning tools in a multiplan IMRT framework. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74:1617-26.
48
Gulliford SL, Webb S, Rowbottom CG, et al. Use of artificial neural networks to predict biological outcomes for patients receiving radical radiotherapy of the prostate. Radiother Oncol. 2004;71:3-12.
49
Pella A, Cambria R, Riboldi M, et al. Use of machine learning methods for prediction of acute toxicity in organs at risk following prostate radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2011;38:2859-2867.
50
Zhen X, Chen J, Zhong Z, et al. Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning for rectum toxicity prediction in cervical cancer radiotherapy: a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:8246-8263.
51
Vial A, Stirling D, Field M, et al. The role of deep learning and radiomic feature extraction in cancer-specific predictive modelling: a review. Transl Cancer Res. 2018;7:803-816.
52
Valdes G, Solberg TD, Heskel M, et al. Using machine learning to predict radiation pneumonitis in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:6105-6120.
53
Bryce TJ, Dewhirst MW, Floyd CE Jr, et al. Artificial neural network model of survival in patients treated with irradiation with and without concurrent chemotherapy for advanced carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;41:339-345.
54
Gensheimer MF, Henry AS, Wood DJ, et al. Automated Survival Prediction in Metastatic Cancer Patients Using High-Dimensional Electronic Medical Record Data. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111:568-574.
55
Oberije C, Nalbantov G, Dekker A, et al. A prospective study comparing the predictions of doctors versus models for treatment outcome of lung cancer patients: a step toward individualized care and shared decision making. Radiother Oncol. 2014;112:37-43.
