Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair: Non-Mesh Suture Repair vs. Lichtentein Procedure
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 134-136
September 2007

Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair: Non-Mesh Suture Repair vs. Lichtentein Procedure

J Ankara Univ Fac Med 2007;60(3):134-136
1. Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Hastanesi, 2. Cerrahi Kliniği
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 11.07.2007
Accepted Date: 09.11.2007
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Background:

Hernia repair is one of the most frequent procedures in surgery. The aim of this study is to compare Lichtenstein procedure and non-mesh suture repair of primary inguinal hernias with respect to quality of life.

Methods:

Between August 2000 and December 2003, 70 patients scheduled for repair of a unilateral primary inguinal hernia were prospectively evaluated by Short Form 36 (SF-36) to assess quality of life after 6 months of operation. Registrars under supervision of consultants did all operations.

Results:

Among 70 patients, 24 patients (34.2%) had undergone non-mesh suture repair and 46 patients (65.8%) had undergone Lichtenstein procedure. SF-36 questionnaire showed a signifi-cant difference in physical function, pain and global health parameters of the test in favour of the Lichtenstein procedure 6 months postoperatively.

Conclusion:

We conclude that long-term quality of life following Lichtenstein procedure is supe-rior to non-mesh suture repair in primary inguinal hernias.

Keywords:
Quality of life, hernia