Menopausal Status at Diagnosis is a Prognostic Indicator in Patients who are Operated for Uterine Carcinosarcoma
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Research Article
VOLUME: ISSUE:
P: -

Menopausal Status at Diagnosis is a Prognostic Indicator in Patients who are Operated for Uterine Carcinosarcoma

1. Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Türkiye
2. Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Clinic of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Türkiye
3. Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 28.09.2024
Accepted Date: 27.03.2025
Online Date: 12.05.2025
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Objectives

Uterine carcinosarcoma is a rare type of uterine cancer, and due to its rarity, there is limited evidence for prognostic factors and treatment. The objective of this study is to assess the influence of histologic, clinical, and demographic characteristics on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Materials and Methods

Patients who had diagnosis of uterine carcinosarcoma and followed by the medical oncology department of three hospitals from Türkiye between January 2013 and January 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. All patients had local disease and were surgically managed, and patients were excluded if they did not have primary surgical management.

Results

The study included 62 women who were primarily treated with surgery and had a median age of 64.5 (interquartile range=14) years. Recurrence was observed in 26 patients (41.9%), with a median RFS of 11.63 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.99-21.26]. A shorter RFS was observed in patients with myometrial invasion [hazard ratio (HR) 2.48, 95% CI 1.04-5.93, p=0.04], while postmenopausal diagnosis was a predictor for longer RFS (HR 0.02, 95% CI 0.004-0.14, p<0.001). The median OS was 43.17 months. Postmenopausal diagnosis was associated with prolonged OS (HR 0.003, 95% CI 0-0.45, p<0.001).

Conclusion

The results of our study show that being diagnosed before menopause is linked to a shorter RFS and OS in women with uterine carcinosarcoma who had surgery to treat local disease.

Keywords:
Uterine carcinosarcoma, prognostic factor, menopausal status

Introduction

Uterine carcinosarcoma, also known as malignant mixed Müllerian tumor, is a rare form of gynecological malignancy, constituting less than 5% of all uterine neoplasms (1). Typically characterized by aggressive behavior, uterine carcinosarcoma is often associated with 15% of all uterine cancer deaths (2). Even in early-stage cases the rate of relapse exceeds 50% (3-5). The median overall survival (OS) rate is less than 2 years for patient with stage 3-4 disease, and the 5-year cancer specific survival rates are about 60%, 20% and 10% for women with stage 1/2, 3, and 4 disease in the e, respectively (6-9).

Endometrial carcinosarcoma is an atypical neoplasm distinguished by its biphasic composition, comprising mesenchymal and epithelial elements (1). Tumor behavior of uterine carcinosarcoma is mainly driven by the carcinomatous component of the disease, whereas endometrial carcinosarcomas exhibit a metastatic pattern that utilizes the lymphatic and intraperitoneal pathways, similar to epithelial tumors and epithelial component is more commonly observed in metastasis (1, 10, 11). The staging system for carcinosarcoma aligns with that of endometrial carcinoma and based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) guidelines. FIGO stage, tumor size, deep myometrial invasion (≥1/2), cervical involvement, parametrial involvement, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), lymph node involvement, presence of heterologous element affect survival (4, 6, 12-14).

Due to the rarity of the disease, there is limited evidence for the treatment. Currently, surgery is the mainstay of the treatment and followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT). There is no clear consensus regarding the adjuvant treatment of the carcinosarcoma. Although adjuvant RT is associated with lower local recurrence rate, there is no OS gain with adjuvant RT (15, 16). While adjuvant chemotherapy is generally recommended for resected stage I-IV uterine carcinosarcoma, there remains no clear consensus regarding its use in stage imperforate anus disease (17, 18). Cochrane review of phase III trials revealed that paclitaxel and ifosfamide regimen and cisplatin, ifosfamide, and mesna regimens were associated with longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS compared to ifosfamide alone or RT (19). Based on the findings from the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)-232B and GOG-261 trials, which demonstrated non-inferiority, and a better toxicity profile compared to the ifosfamide/paclitaxel regimen, the carboplatin/paclitaxel regimen is recommended as the preferred first-line treatment (20, 21).

This retrospective study aimed to identify factors influencing the prognosis in resected uterine carcinosarcoma. Its primary objective was to assess the impact of demographic, clinical, and histologic characteristics on RFS and OS.

Materials and Methods

This is as a retrospective observational study. Patients who had diagnosis of uterine carcinosarcoma and followed by the medical oncology department of three hospitals from Türkiye between January 2013 and January 2023 were included in the study. All patients had local disease and were surgically managed, and none received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were excluded if they did not have primary surgical management. Patients were included in survival analysis if they had any post-operative follow-up contact with medical oncology department. Clinicodemographic features, pathology results and the treatments if any, and recurrence and survival data of the patients were recorded retrospectively. Patients were staged according to the 2023 FIGO staging system for endometrial carcinoma. Staging groups were classified as early FIGO stage (I-II) and advanced FIGO stage (III-IV).

RFS was defined as the date from surgery to the date of first recurrence or in absence of recurrence, to the date of death. OS was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of death.

This study has been approved by the Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Human Research Ethics Committee (approval no.: İ06-385-23, date: 16.06.2023).

Statistics Analysis

We conducted all statistical analyses using the IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0 Statistical Package Program. We described continuous variables as medians [interquartile range (IQR)] and categorical variables as percentages. The chi‐square test was used to compare categorical variables, and the Mann-Whitney U test/Student’s t-test was used to compare continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were conducted for survival analysis. We performed multivariate analyses using variables that had a p-value of less than 0.20 in the univariate analyses. To perform multivariable analyses and calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), we conducted Cox regression analyses. P‐values of <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

From January 2013 to January 2023, 62 patients who primarily treated with surgery were included the analysis. Median age was 64.5 and majority of patients were postmenopausal (n=54, 87.1%). Fifty-two (83.9%) patients presented with abnormal uterine bleeding while 7 (11.3%) patients had abdominal pain. Most performed surgery type was total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), pelvic lymph node dissection and omentectomy. 91.5% of surgeries provided negative surgical margins. Median tumor size was 5.5 (IQR=5.2) cm. Almost half of the patients (48.4) had LVI and 53.2 % had deep myometrial invasion (≥1/2). Thirty-two (51.6%) patients had FIGO stage I-II disease. Other patients’ characteristics were given in Table 1. Half of the patients received any type of adjuvant RT, and 34 (54.8%) patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy other than concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Most commonly utilized chemotherapy regimen was carboplatin and paclitaxel combination (n=23) and followed by ifosfamide, mesna and doxorubicine combination (n=7).

Median follow-up time was 26.4 months. Recurrence occurred in 26 (41.9%) patients and of these 26 recurrences, 6 patients (23.1%) presented with local recurrence only and 20 patients (76.9%) presented with recurrence outside the pelvis (with or without local recurrence) (Table 2). Only 3 of the 7 patients who underwent surgery for the recurrence had negative surgical margins. At recurrence, 19 (73.1%) out of 26 patients received chemotherapy, with the most commonly utilized regimens being carboplatin and paclitaxel (n=5), ifosfamide, mesna, and doxorubicin combination (n=5), and gemcitabine and docetaxel (n=3). Median RFS was 11.63 (95% CI 1.99-21.26) months (Figure 1A). In univariate analysis (Table 3), the presence of LVI (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.01-4.31, p=0.04) and deep myometrial invasion (HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.34-7.34, p=0.008) were both associated with a shorter RFS (Tables 3, 4). Upon multivariate analysis, deep myometrial invasion was significantly associated with poorer RFS (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.04-5.93, p=0.04) while postmenopausal diagnosis was a significant predictor for longer RFS (HR 0.02, 95% CI 0.004-0.14, p<0.001) (Figure 2A).

Median OS was 43.17 months (Figure 1B). Use of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with poorer survival both in univariate and multivariate analysis (HR 2.76, 95% CI 1.09-6.96, p=0.03 and HR 5.74, 95% CI 1.87-17.36, p=0.002, respectively). In multivariate analysis, similar to RFS, postmenopausal diagnosis was associated with prolonged OS (HR 0.003, 95% CI 0-0.45, p<0.001) (Figure 2B, Table 2). Out of 32 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, 21 (65.6%) had FIGO stage III-IV disease. 61.1% of patients who received chemotherapy had serous carcinoma, whereas only 38.9% of patients in the no chemotherapy arm had serous carcinoma.

Discussion

Uterine carcinosarcoma is an uncommon condition, and the absence of a standardized therapeutic method hinders the conduction of studies on this cancer. We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 62 patients who had local uterine carcinosarcoma and were treated with surgery. The study investigated the clinical features and pathological factors that impact RFS and OS. Carcinosarcomas are recognized as one of the most aggressive types of uterine tumors, characterized by a propensity for hematogenous spread, leading to poor OS outcomes. Peak incidence is observed in sixth and seventh decades (6). In our study, the median age at which patients were diagnosed was 64.5 years (IQR=14), with the majority (87.1%) being postmenopausal.

In our study, recurrence rate was 41.9% within 26.4 months of median follow-up time. Recurrence rate was reported within the range 27-82% in the literature (12, 13, 22-24). Differences between recurrence rates may be related to patients’ characteristics, disease stage and the duration of the follow-up time. Median RFS was 11.63 (95% CI 1.99-21.26) months in our study. A Japanese study with similar patient characteristics regarding FIGO stage, deep myometrial invasion, and presence of LVI, but with a higher percentage (91%) of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, reported a RFS of 16.4 months (25). But in that study, adjuvant chemotherapy did not show a significant impact on RFS (HR 1.93, 95% CI 0.55-6.74, p=0.30) (25). Relative these studies in the literature, underutilization of adjuvant therapy may be the cause of shorter RFS in our study. GOG-150 trial showed benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy over RT with 5 years recurrence rates of 58% vs. 52%, respectively (26). Although the supporting evidence is limited, adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy has an impact on RFS, rather than RT, single-agent chemotherapy, or observation in patients with FIGO stage IB-IV carcinosarcoma. In our study, deep myometrial invasion was associated with shorter RFS while postmenopausal diagnosis was associated with prolonged RFS in multivariate analysis (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.04-5.93, p=0.04 and HR 0.02, 95% CI 0.004-0.14, p<0.001, respectively). Previous studies showed that deep myometrial invasion alongside the larger tumor size, FIGO stage, presence of residual tumor, cervical invasion, adnexal involvement, nodal involvement, higher cancer antigen (CA)-125 levels, sarcoma dominance were associated with early recurrence in uterine carcinosarcoma (6, 13, 25, 27, 28).

Median OS was 43.17 months in our study and OS was longer in postmenopausal patients (HR 0.003, 95% CI 0-0.45, p<0.001). Although studies have shown varying results regarding the impact of age on recurrence and OS, the menopausal state has not been commonly evaluated in these studies (12, 29). In a retrospective study, late onset of the menopause was associated with a lengthened OS (29). Estrogen receptors were expressed in 44% of patients with uterine carcinosarcoma, potentially indicating an association with better histological differentiation (30). Median OS for patients with hormone receptor positive carcinosarcoma was significantly longer than for patients with hormone receptor negative tumors (31). However, effect of patient’s hormonal status on prognosis of carcinosarcoma is unknown. Additionally, almost all the patients in our study underwent BSO, so the OS advantage observed in postmenopausal women in our study can be attributed to the more aggressive tumor behavior rather than the effect of hormonal status in premenopausal women. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with poor survival in our study. While adjuvant chemotherapy extends RFS, it does not have a beneficial effect on OS in also other studies (26, 28, 32). It may be due to the high proportion of serous carcinoma and FIGO stage III-IV disease in chemotherapy arm. Use of less effective regimens after adjuvan chemotherapy may be another cause.

Study Limitations

We acknowledge the various limitations of our study. Initially, the sample size in certain patient subgroups is very limited, hence restricting our capacity to carry out comprehensive subgroup analysis. Furthermore, because this study is retrospective, there is a lack of data regarding markers that may affect the prognosis, such as tumor grade, hormone receptor status, CA-125 levels. Lastly, the lack of standardized treatment protocols among patients can impact the results of the study. These constraints underscore the necessity of exercising prudence while interpreting and extrapolating the findings of the study. We need future research with larger, more comprehensive datasets and standardized protocols to address these limitations and provide more definitive conclusions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, due to the rarity of uterine carcinosarcoma, conducting prospective studies with large sample sizes is challenging. The information available in the literature on this cancer type is conflicting, and our understanding of prognostic factors and optimal adjuvant treatments remains limited, with several gray areas requiring clarification. Our study findings suggest that a premenopausal diagnosis is associated with shorter RFS and OS. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to improve survival outcomes and enhance the quality of life for patients with uterine carcinosarcoma.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: This study has been approved by the Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Human Research Ethics Committee (approval no.: İ06-385-23, date: 16.06.2023).
Informed Consent: This is as a retrospective observational study.

Authorship Contributions

Concept: H.B., E.B.K., Design: H.B., E.B.K., Data Collection and/or Processing: H.B., M.Y., S.S., F.Y., O.A., D.U., O.Y., Analysis and/or Interpretation: H.B., M.Y., Literature Search: H.B., E.B.K., Writing: H.B., D.U., O.Y., E.B.K.
Conflict of Interest: There is no potential conflict of interest to declare.
Financial Disclosure: This study received no financial support.

References

1
Pezzicoli G, Moscaritolo F, Silvestris E, et al. Uterine carcinosarcoma: an overview. Critical Rev Oncol/Hematol. 2021;163:103369.
2
El-Nashar SA, Mariani A. Uterine carcinosarcoma. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;54:292-304.
3
Leath CA3rdNumnum TM, Kendrick JE4th, et al. Patterns of failure for conservatively managed surgical stage I uterine carcinosarcoma: implications for adjuvant therapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19:888-891.
4
Sartori E, Bazzurini L, Gadducci A, et al. Carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a clinicopathological multicenter CTF study. Gynecologic Oncology. 1997;67:70-75.
5
Major FJ, Blessing JA, Silverberg SG, et al. Prognostic factors in early‐stage uterine sarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer. 1993;71:1702-1709.
6
Matsuzaki S, Klar M, Matsuzaki S, Roman LD, Sood AK, Matsuo K. Uterine carcinosarcoma: contemporary clinical summary, molecular updates, and future research opportunity. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;160:586-601.
7
Raffone A, Travaglino A, Raimondo D, et al. Uterine carcinosarcoma vs endometrial serous and clear cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of survival. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2022;158:520-527.
8
Toboni MD, Crane EK, Brown J, Shushkevich A, et al. Uterine carcinosarcomas: from pathology to practice. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;162:235-241.
9
Gonzalez Bosquet J, Terstriep SA, Cliby WA, et al. The impact of multi-modal therapy on survival for uterine carcinosarcomas. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116:419-423.
10
Bogani G, Ray-Coquard I, Concin N, et al. Endometrial carcinosarcoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023;33:147-174.
11
Gotoh O, Sugiyama Y, Takazawa Y, et al. Clinically relevant molecular subtypes and genomic alteration-independent differentiation in gynecologic carcinosarcoma. Nature Communications. 2019;10:4965.
12
Kurnit KC, Previs RA, Soliman PT, et al. Prognostic factors impacting survival in early stage uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;152:31-37.
13
Terblanche L, Botha MH. Uterine carcinosarcoma: a 10-year single institution experience. PloS One. 2022;17:0271526.
14
Zhu J, Wen H, Bi R, Wu X. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and outcomes in uterine carcinosarcoma and grade 3 endometrial cancer patients: a comparative study. J Gynecol Oncol. 2016;27:18.
15
Callister M, Ramondetta LM, Jhingran A, et al. Malignant mixed Müllerian tumors of the uterus: analysis of patterns of failure, prognostic factors, and treatment outcome. Int J Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;58:786-796.
16
Nemani D, Mitra N, Guo M, et al. Assessing the effects of lymphadenectomy and radiation therapy in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: a SEER analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:82-88.
17
NCCN Guidelines version 3.2025 Uterine Neoplasms [Internet]. [Retrieved on 2025] Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/uterine.pdf.
18
Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, et al. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO consensus conference on endometrial cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;26:2-30.
19
Galaal K, van der Heijden E, Godfrey K, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy after surgery for uterine carcinosarcoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013:CD006812.
20
Powell MA, Filiaci VL, Hensley ML, et al. Randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin versus paclitaxel and ifosfamide in patients with carcinosarcoma of the uterus or ovary: an NRG oncology trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:968-977.
21
Powell MA, Filiaci VL, Rose PG, et al. Phase II evaluation of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2727-2731.
22
Wu TI, Chang TC, Hsueh S, et al. Prognostic factors and impact of adjuvant chemotherapy for uterine leiomyosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;100:166-172.
23
Abeler VM, Røyne O, Thoresen S, et al. Uterine sarcomas in Norway. A histopathological and prognostic survey of a total population from 1970 to 2000 including 419 patients. Histopathology. 2009;54:355-364.
24
Chantharasamee J, Wong K, Potivongsajarn P, et al. Retrospective analysis of adjuvant treatment for localized, operable uterine leiomyosarcoma. Cancer Med. 2022;11:2906-2912.
25
Harano K, Hirakawa A, Yunokawa M, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study from the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group. Int J Clin Oncol. 2016;21:168-76.
26
Wolfson AH, Brady MF, Rocereto T, et al. A gynecologic oncology group randomized phase III trial of whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) vs. cisplatin-ifosfamide and mesna (CIM) as post-surgical therapy in stage I–IV carcinosarcoma (CS) of the uterus. Gynecol oncol. 2007;107:177-185.
27
Abdulfatah E, Lordello L, Khurram M, et al. Predictive histologic factors in carcinosarcomas of the uterus: a multi-institutional study. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2019;38:205-215.
28
Galaal K, Kew F, Tam K, et al. Evaluation of prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in uterine carcinosarcoma. Eur J Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;143:88-92.
29
Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Obermair A, et al. Prognostic parameters in carcinosarcomas of the uterus: a clinico-pathologic study. Anticancer Res. 2001;21:3069-3074.
30
Ioffe Y, Li A, Walsh C, et al. Hormone receptor expression in uterine sarcomas: prognostic and therapeutic roles. Gynecol Oncology. 2009;115:466-71.
31
Jones NL, Wu S, Xiu J, et al. Association of the presence of estrogen and progesterone receptors in uterine carcinosarcoma with improved survival and increased immunogenicity. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(Suppl 15)5588.
32
Chiang C-Y, Huang H-J, Chang W-Y, et al. Adjuvant therapy and prognosis in uterine carcinosarcoma. J Formos Med Assoc. 2021;120:1977-1987.