Comparison of Social Support Levels of Gynecological Oncology Patients in the First and Fourth Cycles of Chemotherapy
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Research Article
P: 156-163
June 2024

Comparison of Social Support Levels of Gynecological Oncology Patients in the First and Fourth Cycles of Chemotherapy

J Ankara Univ Fac Med 2024;77(2):156-163
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 04.12.2023
Accepted Date: 18.04.2024
Online Date: 12.08.2024
Publish Date: 12.08.2024
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the social support levels of gynecological oncology patients regarding the first and fourth cycles of chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods

This descriptive study was planned to determine the social support levels of 50 women admitted to the gynecological oncology outpatient clinic and service in Ankara University Health Practice and Research Hospitals, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gyneacology during the first and fourth cycles of chemotherapy. After the informed consent form was read and signed by the women who met the research criteria and agreed to participate in the study, the data were collected face-to-face with the “Descriptive Characteristics Form” and “Cancer Patient Social Support Scale”.

Results

The age of the 50 participants was 59.20±10.18 years, the number of pregnancies was 3.18±1.83, the number of births was 2.42±1.48, and the age at menopause was 46.86±7.91. The initial score was 130.8±18.23 and the final score was 130.46±17.94. When the score change was analysed, it was found to be -0.34±18.52. When compared according to the 1st cycle and 4th cycle chemotherapy treatments of the participants in the study, an increase of 10% was observed in 26% of the patients in the scale scores. It was observed that there was a significant difference with those who had a good degree of knowledge about the disease, and there was a significant difference with the question of with whom the patient lived at home. No significant difference was found in other evaluation criteria. When the Pearson correlation analyses of the change in the scale score and the 10% increase in the score of the participants according to the 1st cycle and 4th cycle chemotherapy treatments were examined, it was determined that the degree of knowledge about the disease showed a moderate negative correlation. In the score change, it was found that there was a moderate negative correlation with with whom she lived at home.

Conclusion

It is recommended to determine the social support levels and needs of women diagnosed with gynecological cancer in chemotherapy treatment processes and to cooperate with the patient’s family and environment in this direction.

References

1
Şelimen D, Turhal S, Karamanoğlu A. Onkoloji Hemşireliği Hizmet İçi Eğitim Kursu. Onbir Matbaacılık Yayıncılık Ltd. İstanbul, 2003.
2
Beser NG, Öz F. Kemoterapi Alan Lenfomalı Hastaların Anksiyete-Depresyon Düzeyleri ve Yaşam Kaliteleri. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksek Okulu Dergisi. 2003;7:47-58.
3
Durna Z, Aydıner A. Kanser Kemoterapi Rehberi ve Uygulamaya Yönelik Öneriler. Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri, İstanbul, pp. 3-7, 2003.
4
Karabulutlu Ö. Symptom Management and Continuation of Life Quality in the Patients Receiving Chemotherapy. FNJN. 2009;17:218-225.
5
Bıkmaz Z. Lösemili Hastaların Yaşam Kalitesi ve Sosyal Destek Düzeylerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Trakya Üniversitesi, Edirne, 2009.
6
Dedeli Ö, Fadıloğlu Ç, Uslu R. Kanserli Bireylerin Fonksiyonel Durumları ve Algıladıkları Sosyal Desteğin İncelenmesi. Türk Onkoloji Dergisi. 2008;23:132-139.
7
Usta YY. Importance of Social Support in Cancer Patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13:3569-3572.
8
Eylen B. Kanser Hastası Sosyal Destek Ölçeği’nin Geçerlik, Güvenirlik ve Faktör Yapısı Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012;5:109-117.
9
Çetin ZE. Parsiyel Larenjektomili Hastalarda Farklı Operasyon Tiplerinin Yutma Fonksiyonlarına ve Hayat Kalitesine Etkisi. Uzmanlık Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir, 2014.
10
Penedo FJ, Traeger L, Benedict C, et al. Perceived Social Support as a Predictor of Disease-Specific Quality of Life in Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients. J Support Oncol. 2012;10:119-123.
11
Işıkhan V. Cancer and Social Support. Journal of Society & Social Work. 2007;18:15-29.
12
Vardar O. Kemoterapi Alan Jinekolojik Kanserli Hastalar için Geliştirilen Mobil Uygulamanın Fiziksel ve Psikososyal Uyum Üzerine Etkisi. Hemşirelik Anabilim Dalı Doktora Tezi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Denizli, 2023.
13
Ayaz S, Yaman Efe Ş, Korukluoğlu S. Level of Perceived Social Support of Patients with Gynaecological Cancer and Affecting Factors. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci. 2008;28:880-885.
14
Yılmaz S, Vural G. Determining the Relationship between Perceived Social Support Levels and Chemotherapy Symptoms in Women with Gynaecological Cancer. Bezmialem Science. 2021;9:326-333.
15
Çakır F, Nazik E. Determination Of Quality Of Life Of Patients With Gynecological Cancer. YOBU Faculty of Health Journal. 2022;3:117-129.