Analysis of Morphological Features and Contrast Enhancement Kinetics of Malignant Breast Masses by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Research Article
VOLUME: 65 ISSUE: 3
P: 147 - 154
December 2012

Analysis of Morphological Features and Contrast Enhancement Kinetics of Malignant Breast Masses by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

J Ankara Univ Fac Med 2012;65(3):147-154
1. S.B. Dıșkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Eğitim ve Araștırma Hastanesi, Radyoloji Kliniği, Ankara
2. S.B. Mersin Kadın Doğum ve Çocuk Hastalıkları Hastanesi Radyoloji Bölümü, Mersin
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 30.03.2012
Accepted Date: 09.01.2014
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Aim:

Our aim was to analyze breast lesions meeting the malignancy criteria on mammography and breast ultrasonography (US), by using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Material and Methods:

Fifty females with findings of malignancy on mammography and US, with a mean age ± SD of 50.79 ± 11.1 years were included. 51 breast lesions were evaluated using a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging system. T2-weighted turbo inversion recovery magnitude, precontrast T1-weighted SE and 3D T1-weighted Fast Low Angle Shot images were obtained. Postcontrast 3D T1-weighted fast low angle shot sequence with fat suppression was applied after intravenous administration of Gadopentenate diethylene tri-amine pentaacetic acid. Lesions were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively according to their morphology and contrast enhancement kinetics.

Results:

Mean size ± SD of the lesions was 29.15 ± 11.5 mm. On MRI, 18 lesions had spiculated contours, 26 had irregular contours, five had lobular contours and two had regular contours. Of 51 breast lesions, 36 (70.6%) were histopathologically diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma, seven (13.7%) as invasive lobular carcinoma, three (5.9%) as invasive tubular carcinoma, three (5.9%) as inflammatory carcinoma and two (3.9%) as mucinous carcinoma. Indicating malignancy, type 3 time-signal intensity curve and early-phase contrast enhancement rate more than 80%, were detected in 35/51 (68.6%) and 39/51 (76.5%) breast lesions, respectively. Indicating benignity, type 1 time-signal intensity curve and early-phase contrast enhancement rate equal to or less than 60%, were detected in 1/51 (2%) and 3/51 (5.9%) breast lesions, respectively.

Conclusion:

Used with mammography and US, dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is a useful method in diagnosis of malignant breast lesions.

Keywords:
Breast, carcinoma, magnetic resonance imaging, contrast media