Original Article

Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair: Non-Mesh Suture Repair vs. Lichtentein Procedure

  • Bülent Ünal
  • Melih Karabeyoğlu
  • Demet Ünal
  • Betül Bozkurt
  • Osman Yıldırım
  • Belma Koçer
  • Mete Dolapçı
  • Ömer Cengiz

Received Date: 11.07.2007 Accepted Date: 09.11.2007 J Ankara Univ Fac Med 2007;60(3):134-136

Background:

Hernia repair is one of the most frequent procedures in surgery. The aim of this study is to compare Lichtenstein procedure and non-mesh suture repair of primary inguinal hernias with respect to quality of life.

Methods:

Between August 2000 and December 2003, 70 patients scheduled for repair of a unilateral primary inguinal hernia were prospectively evaluated by Short Form 36 (SF-36) to assess quality of life after 6 months of operation. Registrars under supervision of consultants did all operations.

Results:

Among 70 patients, 24 patients (34.2%) had undergone non-mesh suture repair and 46 patients (65.8%) had undergone Lichtenstein procedure. SF-36 questionnaire showed a signifi-cant difference in physical function, pain and global health parameters of the test in favour of the Lichtenstein procedure 6 months postoperatively.

Conclusion:

We conclude that long-term quality of life following Lichtenstein procedure is supe-rior to non-mesh suture repair in primary inguinal hernias.

Keywords: Quality of life, hernia